The Bad Bunny Superbowl Spectacle
Culture War Halftime: Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl Pick Ignites a Fury of ‘Anti-American’ Backlash
The Super Bowl LX Halftime Show is still months away, but the culture war has officially begun. The moment the NFL, Apple Music, and Roc Nation announced that global superstar Bad Bunny would headline the 2026 spectacle, the reaction split the internet, exposing a deep fault line in American culture that goes far beyond music.
The controversy isn’t about the show itself—it hasn’t happened yet. It’s about the very fact of the selection.
The “Language” and “Identity” Clash
Bad Bunny (Benito Antonio Martínez Ocasio), the undisputed king of global streaming, is a Puerto Rican artist who primarily performs in Spanish. For his millions of fans, the selection is a powerful, long-overdue moment of Latino representation and a recognition of music’s global shift.
For critics, however, this became the core of the outrage. Complaints rapidly emerged, arguing that the Halftime Show—a tradition on a major American holiday—should feature a performance entirely in English.
- The Political Blowback: Conservative commentators and lawmakers, including Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, publicly condemned the choice as a “terrible decision,” suggesting the NFL was turning “anti-American” and should have instead chosen a “patriotic” artist like Lee Greenwood.
- The “Anything in English” Alternative: The backlash was formalized when Turning Point USA, a conservative advocacy group, announced plans to run a competing “All-American Halftime Show” during the break, with a survey openly asking for music genres that included the option: “Anything in English.” This move has solidified the narrative that the Super Bowl has become a political battleground over cultural identity.
The Shadow of Politics and Social Commentary
Bad Bunny is not just a musician; he is an outspoken activist who weaves his critique of colonial politics, social inequality, and immigration into his art and public statements. His past criticism of President Donald Trump and his dedication of the Super Bowl opportunity to “my people, my culture, and our history” was immediately weaponized by detractors.
The debate is now focused less on his musicality and more on the political boundaries the NFL will attempt to enforce:
- Censorship Questions: Given the NFL’s history of advising against political messaging (which artists like J.Lo and Eminem have sometimes ignored), the question is whether Bad Bunny will be permitted to feature his trademark symbolism regarding Puerto Rican identity or immigration struggles.
- The SNL Taunt: Bad Bunny himself fanned the flames while hosting Saturday Night Live, celebrating his role as a victory for the Latino community and firing a direct shot at his critics with a sarcastic jab: “If you didn’t understand what I just said, you have four months to learn [Spanish].” This quote became instant fuel for the conservative counter-programming efforts.
A Win for Exposure, A Loss for Unity?
While the controversy rages, supporters like Jay-Z (whose Roc Nation curates the show) and Jennifer Lopez hail the choice as a brilliant and necessary move to court a younger, more diverse, and global audience. Bad Bunny’s music streams have predictably soared following the announcement, proving that there is a massive appetite for his appearance.
The 2026 Super Bowl Halftime Show is no longer just a musical event; it is a cultural flashpoint that forces a conversation about who gets to define “American” pop culture. For the NFL, it’s a calculated risk in the pursuit of global relevancy. For Bad Bunny, it’s the biggest platform ever handed to an artist who has spent his career challenging the status quo. The stage is set for a performance that promises to be either a triumphant cultural moment or the most divisive fifteen minutes in Super Bowl history.
Every product/service is selected by editors. Products/Services you buy through these links may earn “SMG” a commission or revenue.
